 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Phased Array Coil
Phased array coil generally consisted of a
number of mutually decoupled surface coils that simultaneously
receive MR signals. Although an individual surface coil gives the
highest possible SNR for a volume comparable to the
diameter of the coil, a single surface coil can only effectively
image a limited region whose dimensions are also comparable to the
diameter of the coil. Thus, by combining these non-interacting
surface coils forming a phased array coil, an image of a larger area
can be obtained with uniform sensitivity and higher
SNR as compared to standard MR volume coil.
The most important aspect in building a
phased array coil is to minimize the mutual coupling that exists
between neighbouring surface coils. Mutual coupling causes
splitting of the resonance frequency and disrupt phased array
transmit and receive pattern. Several decoupling techniques such
as overlapping of coils
[1], insertion of capacitors between coils
[5-6] and
network decoupling interface
[7] are some of the methods used to
reduce mutual coupling between coil elements.
In this section, we will
demonstrate how a 2 Tesla
(85 Mhz) receive only 3 element phased array coil using the overlapping method
is constructed with the help of FEKO and tested in a Brukers 2T MRI system. The size of each
surface coil is 120mm by 120mm using 10mm wide copper tape.
Overlapping method involves careful geometric
overlapping of coils, so that mutual decoupling can be achieved.
Before the actual prototype 3 element phased
array coil is built, the design is run in FEKO to obtain the
overlapping distant. Illustrated in Fig 1(a) shows 3
surface coils resonating at 85Mhz placed 5mm apart from each other,
which causes the splitting of the resonance frequency in the S11
response as shown in
Fig1(b). Fig 2(a) depict how the 3 surface coils are overlapped
and the optimum overlapping distant between coils from FEKO
simulation is 92mm. Fig 2(b) is the S11 response showing
the splitting of the resonance frequency has merged back which
indicates mutual coupling is minimized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Fig 1(a) |

Fig 1(b) |

Fig 2(a)
|

Fig 2(b) |
|
(Click picture to see
enlarged) |
|
|
|
From FEKO simulation results, the prototype 3 element phased array
coil is constructed as closely to the design in FEKO simulation with
overlapping distant between coils of 92mm as shown in Fig 3. Fig
4(a)-(c) are images of saline bags used as phantoms acquired by
the prototype 3 element phased array coil using Bruker 2T MRI
system. From these 3 images,
it can be observed that mutual coupling between coils is minimized
when correct
overlapping distant is used and each
surface coil effectively images only a small region comparable to
their dimension.
|
|
|
|
|

Fig 3 |
|
|

Fig 4(a)
|

Fig 4(b) |

Fig 4(c)
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Author
|
UQ ITEE
|
FEKO|
References |
|