Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Questions about the Ethernet interface

[Peter Ryser <Peter.Ryser@xilinx.com>]

John,

I'd like to encourage you to fix the xparameters.h to match up the 
defines used in the drivers instead of changing the drivers. As a result 
you will get EDK integration for free.

- Peter


John Williams wrote:

> Peter Ryser wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> how much is your Ethernet integration for MicroBlaze different from 
>> the PPC one?
>
>
> Not very different at all:
>
>  - changed the IRQ assignment method, the stuff from Montavista 
> referres to #defines that aren't in the XPARAMETERs file
>  - changed the MAC address assignment - instead of trying to pull it 
> from the PPCBOOT structure, I've just hard coded it for now.  A short 
> term solution while I debug the uclinux tcp/ip code
>
> That's about it really - as I've said before there's some wierdness in 
> the #DEFINEs that the montavista code seems to be expecting, certainly 
> nothing like gets generated when I run EDK.  Maybe they are produced 
> by the MLD stuff that you use, not sure??
>
> John
>
>
> ___________________________
> microblaze-uclinux mailing list
> microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
> Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
> Mailing List Archive : 
> http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
>

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/