Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Questions about the Ethernet interface

[John Williams <jwilliams@itee.uq.edu.au>]

John Williams wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I think I've found the problem - for some reason, when the 
> xemac_intr_fifo handler calls the packet FIFO functions (contained in 
> arch/microblaze/xilinx_ocp/*) - an extra 32 zero bits are attached to 
> the start of the data (and the packet length is also out by 4)

sorry scratch that - enthusiasm at potentially finding this bug blinded 
me to an error my diagnostic code was making - back into it.... :-S


___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/