[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
Hi,
emanuel stiebler wrote:
> Goran Bilski wrote:
>
>> The 100 DMIPS is when running at 125 MHz with the HW divider enabled
>> and running from BRAM.
>> On a 100 MHz microblaze running from external memory this is what you
>> can expect.
>> I'm however working on things to improve this but this is the current
>> fact.
>> So a 150 MHz MicroBlaze in V2P will give you around 50 DMIPS with
>> external memories.
>> It's also depending on the external memory. A fast SRAM will give you
>> better values than a SDRAM.
>> A really fast SRAM can improve it quite a lot. But they are expensive.
>
>
> You have any experience what type of SRAM would give the best results,
> for lets say a 8 MByte system ? Any idea what the speedup would be ?
The faster the better but also the more expensive.
Today using SDRAM will give you a latency of 12 clock cycles.
Running at 100 MHz and with 10 ns memory might get you down to around
4-5 clock cycles.
I'm not sure since I don't have this kind of boards.
The DMIPS number will go up.
Another way is to wait for me to get the new stuff done and tested.
>
>> Another way to improve the numbers is to use the harvard architecute
>> of MicroBlaze and have 2 OPB busses and two external memories.
>
>
> But we can't support it on the uclinux ...
>
> Cheers,
> emanuel
>
>
>
> ___________________________
> microblaze-uclinux mailing list
> microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
> Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
> Mailing List Archive :
> http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
>
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
- References:
- [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance