[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
emanuel stiebler wrote:
> Goran Bilski wrote:
>
>> Another way to improve the numbers is to use the harvard architecute
>> of MicroBlaze and have 2 OPB busses and two external memories.
>
>
> But we can't support it on the uclinux ...
That's not strictly true... it would just require some (major?) work in
the kernel, to support two memory pools - one for data, and one for
code, and in the hardware we'd instantiate bridges so that we are able
to write into code space.
Not trivial, but certainly doable I think.
John
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
- References:
- [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance