Re: [microblaze-uclinux] [patch] memory management initialisationcleanup

[John Williams <jwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi again,

Matthew Rubenstein wrote:

> 	Well, given that it's in flux (ie. the activity on this maillist :)...
> I'm talking about the version that John Williams is maintaining. Minimal
> API differences will mean minimal work to port other uCLinux apps to
> uC/MB. Those apps, and the community of their developers, are the
> reasons that uC/MB is interesting beyond the community of academic FPGA
> experimenters.

I am certainly aware (and very happy) that people are doing commercial 
development on this platform.   Changes that go into CVS are intended to 
improve the stability, performance or functionality of the microblaze 
port.  This is the patch flux that you witness on this list.   The API 
is the system call interface - and compatibility is the #1 priority there.

The research code isn't part of that.  I have a library of patches that 
I maintain for my experimental stuff - they certainly don't belong in a 
production kernel.

Anyway I appreciate your comments - the future direction of this project 
is definitely worthy of discussion.

Cheers,

John

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/