Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uclinux boots using the image stored in

[emanuel stiebler <emu@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

anand_12 wrote:
> 
> Hi john,Emanuel
> 
>  Fine.I agree with you on the fact that the bootloader can 
be stored in the FLASH.It will be great if you can specify
> the reasons why you think using the internal BRAM would be
  a sub-optimal way of doing it.I am relatively new to this
> field and hence am not aware of any compelling reason to 
avoid using internal BRAM.Please suggest any references(if
any )so that I can start thinking on those directions too.

Hello Anand,
I'm not sure about that, but from what I understood, there is
some problem using the smaller spartan IIe chips with MicroBlaze and
uclinux, as they don't have enough memory (BRAM) for the boot loader.
And the smallest spartan IIe which works, is the xc2s400e, but it is 
very expensive.

cheers

P.S. Could you please cut your lines, so they are shorten than 80 chars ?

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/