Re: [microblaze-uclinux] [dist] why vendors/Xilinx instead of vendors/config/microblaze?

[Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:47:41 +1000,
John Williams wrote:
[...]
> > anyone object?
> 
> Not at all, although as always backwards compatability is important, 
> especially so that folks who've created their own local /vendors/... 
> subdir (rather than tweaking mbvanilla) can continue without too much pain.
> 
> Perhaps just duplicate what's currently /vendors/Xilinx into 
> /vendors/config/microblaze, update the mbvanilla_net, suzaku and that 
> V2Pro platform, but still leave the old /Xilinx stuff there to whither 
> and die?

ok, I'll create a patch to do that.  I'll also update README in
vendors/Xilinx to make sure that people know the directory is
obsoluted by vendors/config/microblaze.

I say we'll keep one or two dist cut and remove vendors/Xilinx all
together.

I'll post a patch later.

best,
--
             yashi

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/