[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM

To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM
From: Steve Sanders <akasanders@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:26:51 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=XWmfHe7cKBUDS2Mv72Ic9/KC533qlSPGMPf9BwZepf0JfcrXYI4OD1MpsfYlRClyVwEarjdKF++eMzjZZfXLCn7UzU8Eoh1N4GFR3kmv/r5tuaAwjvTH+eq+Uff65xgXL4A6dNpOjFspTUiQUP5AohSK1+pjc00oidLkJlTN5u0= ;
In-reply-to: <41C68047.1000002@itee.uq.edu.au>
Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Right, good point - I don't have I or D cache enabled yet, either.  My
approach is: make it work, then make it work better.

> >>
> > What's the system clock speed? The 1.07 BogoMIPS seems a bit low...
> 
> That'll be without caches, and as Steve says, with conservative SRAM 
> timings.  I'd expect to see a 10x improvement with a small (8k?) 
> insutruction cache in the microblaze.
> 
> John

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/

References:
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM
  - From: John Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ML300 board?
Next by Date: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM
Previous by thread: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM
Next by thread: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] uClinux on a Spartan 3 'S400, 1MB of SRAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread