Yes,it does. In fact,I'm trying to get more perspective into trade-offs between an mmu-less system with stable OS and lower complexity vs processors with mmu.I guess my question would'nt have been that vague had I done that earlier.Thanks,for your reply though!
TRO.
Henrik.Westlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The microblaze was "originally" intended to replace state machines implemented as logic in a hardware description language.
Now, the microblaze is capapble of running a complete operating system! That is a major step.
That was not an answer to you question but perhaps gave a bit of perspective.
BR Henrik
Hi All,
I have a question. It is kind of off-topic, so please bear with me. I don't know how smart a question this is either, so again,bear with me on that. Going through this list I was just wondering why an MMU for Microblaze does'nt exist. How much work would doing something like that involve? Is this a feasible / useful kind of thing for undertaking? Thanks.
-TRO.