[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[microblaze-uclinux] uclinux and multiple microblaze

To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [microblaze-uclinux] uclinux and multiple microblaze
From: "Mayank Ahuja" <mayank.ahuja@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:18:29 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=MKYNCv4fKvYJD+y5yXbqtyVna488PNB9/4SuRsH5gIS9iyBRG7xLSzvnrGulLoMF7nrNwjMVjmvU7IKmFbwNxYuzEUuW7TFjLU3BEoF/Rm5Fzr4Q0affcl2ngiRLwtCL5oCvSZnQbuVvTBquCUrSxkdIn4fIJ8LrIOnGrSt4H18=
Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am using Diliglent board based on Virtex-II Pro XC2VP30. I have been able to build a system with single microblaze running uClinux and an application which accepts packet over the network.

In the same setup I have added one more microblaze with standalone OS. My intention is to have the first microblaze as interface to network and rest of the microblaze (at present one) running on the data collected. The problem I am facing in current setup is that the uClinux bootup sequence (as visible on UART) stops at arbritrary location. Any help shall be appreciable.

Both the microblaze are connected to same XMD.

Mayank

Follow-Ups:
- [microblaze-uclinux] Re: uclinux and multiple microblaze
  - From: Mayank Ahuja

Prev by Date: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] telnetd: All network ports in use.
Next by Date: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: uclinux and multiple microblaze
Previous by thread: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] telnetd: All network ports in use.
Next by thread: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: uclinux and multiple microblaze
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread