[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RTLinux patch (was RE: [microblaze-uclinux] Implementing FAT on uCLinux)
Hi Alejandro,
thanks for your reply.
It sounds like with this stuff, a user program can't use poll() to wait for interrupt "events" but gets interrupt notification directly by the RTLinux management, passed around the kernel, right? My impression of your detailed description: The kernel (drivers) shouldn't be used for connecting interrupts to the user program, but only for slow and not time-critical stuff because it's constantly scheduled as task with the lowest priority in the whole system. Right?
Yes, I should read some docu...
CU, F@lk
Alejandro Lucero wrote (January 10, 2007 4:49 PM)
> It's necessary to make the difference between RTLinux and
> real time Linux
> patches.
...8<.....8<.....8<...
>
> I hope this explanation can help you.
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/