Re: [microblaze-uclinux] memory/peripherals mapping

[John Williams <jwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Emmanual,

e.stiebler wrote:
> Is there a reason, why the memory couldn't be mapped to the same 
> loacation on all microblaze ports ?
> Like from 0x1000.0000 to 0x1fff.ffff as in the ML401 port ?

No specific reason - typically the memory just ends up where BSB puts it.

The ML401 reference design is actually derived from one that was 
hand-created at Xilinx, not using BSB.  That's why it's different from 
the rest.

Is there any specific benefit you would see in having the memory maps 
the same (subject to memory size and peripheral set differences of course)?

John
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/