[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.

To: <microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.
From: "Brettschneider Falk" <fbrettschneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:01:06 +0100
Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

kenneth johansson wrote:
> Sorry to hear you have problems but the patch is right and 
> necessary for
> every possible combination of configurations.good to hear it's more stable for you, but nevertheless the patch doesn't seem to be right for all cases because
both boot loggings I showed to you just differ in 1 line with your 'disable_irq'. I went the safe way and did a 'make clean all' for both of my trials.

CU, F@lk


___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.
  - From: Kenneth Johansson

Prev by Date: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] hardware configuration
Next by Date: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.
Previous by thread: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.
Next by thread: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH] return from interrupt.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread