RE: [microblaze-uclinux] Petalinux, BSP, EDK 9.2

["Torin Ford" <torin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think I figured out the problem.  With ISE/EDK 9.2i the flash memory is now using xps_mch_emc.  This causes the petalinux_v2_1_0.tcl to look for the wrong parameter names.  I haven't fully tested, but to at least get through the make -f system.make libs command, I added the following lines:

 

 } elseif {[string match $controller_type "xps_mch_emc"]} {
  set base_param_name "C_MEM0_BASEADDR"
  set high_param_name "C_MEM0_HIGHADDR"
  set width_param_name "C_MEM0_WIDTH"
  set dwidth_matching_param_name "C_INCLUDE_DATAWIDTH_MATCHING_0"

 

to the do_memory_setup procedure.

 

Thanks,

 

Torin Ford

 

---

From: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Torin Ford
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:00 PM
To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [microblaze-uclinux] Petalinux, BSP, EDK 9.2

Hey,

   Back on October 29, 2007, Tom Curran sent this to the list:

 

http://marc.info/?l=microblaze-uclinux&m=119367353019078&w=2

 

There were quite a few responses, but it didn't seem like much ever came out of it.  I'm trying to use the 0.30 build of petalinux on 64 bit CentOS 5.1 and am running in to this problem mentioned in one of the follow ups:

 

http://marc.info/?l=microblaze-uclinux&m=119376582714060&w=2

 

Has anyone been about to get around this format issue?  Or does anyone know what the root cause is and if it can be fixed?

 

Thanks,

 

Torin Ford