[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ETHERNET LITE not recognized

To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ETHERNET LITE not recognized
From: John Williams <john.williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:09:14 +1000
In-reply-to: <80e9e270903310104l56f09ef0uf71a65af3100b0e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <c1b9fea80903302239m5884dd3cn1567b90b9b749a27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <80e9e270903310104l56f09ef0uf71a65af3100b0e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Thierry,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Thierry BESSIERE
<t.bessiere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I recompiled the petaLinux kernel with the controller “Xilinx OPB EMAC Lite”. Now, this module is properly detected. It was just I did not know that EMAC LITE with a PLB bus had the same driver that EMAC LITE with an OPB bus so I chose the generic driver.

We should rename the menu option, it is confusing I agree.

Regards,

John
--
John Williams, PhD, B.Eng, B.IT
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com  p: +61-7-30090663  f: +61-7-30090663

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/

References:
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ETHERNET LITE not recognized
  - From: Matt Staniszewski
- Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ETHERNET LITE not recognized
  - From: Thierry BESSIERE

Prev by Date: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] spi and spidev usage
Next by Date: Antwort: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] connection through gateway
Previous by thread: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] ETHERNET LITE not recognized
Next by thread: [microblaze-uclinux] connection through gateway
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread