(See the team)
A complication of model checking is that the models used are not easily understandable to the target users of the tool. Therefore, another key challenge is to integrate the model checker into a verification environment that allows users to test the model in a graphical tool and to play back counter-examples from the model checker possibly through an animator.
- Winter, K., Johnston, W., Robinson, P., Strooper, P. and van den Berg, L. (2005). Tool Support for Checking Railway Interlocking Designs. In Proc. Tenth Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software (SCS 2005), Sydney, Australia. CRPIT, 55. Cant, T., Ed. ACS. 101-107.
- W. Johnston, K. Winter, L. van den Berg, P. Strooper, P. Robinson, Model-based Variable and Transition Orderings for efficient Symbolic Model Checking, In J. Misra, T. Nipkow, E. Sekerinski, editors, 14th International Symposium on Formal Methods (FM 2006) volume 4085 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 524 - 540. Springer-Verlag, 2006. (electronically available at Springer)
- L. van den Berg, P. Strooper, W. Johnston, An Automated Approach for the Interpretation of Counter-Examples, 1st Workshop on Verification and Debugging, Seattle, August 21, 2006.
- L. van den Berg and P. Strooper and K. Winter, Introducing Time in an Industrial Application of Model Checking, In Proc. of 12th Int. ERCIM Workshop on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS'07) , volume 4916 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 56-67. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
